SellingBrew

Insights & Tips

Already a subscriber? Login

Become a subscriber and unlock an information arsenal focused on making your sales operation more effective.

Sales Teams Are Still Using BANT? Seriously?

A subscriber attending a SellingBrew webinar asked a question that really made me think. Now, the question itself was pretty straightforward:

What’s the problem with using BANT for prospect qualification?

And the answer was fairly straightforward as well:

While BANT (budget, authority, need, and time-frame) is certainly a popular set of qualification criteria, it’s got at least one major flaw:

By definition, prospects who have already established a budget and time-frame are most of the way through their decision-making process.

On the surface, this seems like a great thing because the prospect is much closer to making a purchase. However, a prospect who’s already this far along in the decision process probably has a vendor in mind already. In fact, that vendor has most likely helped the prospect to define the needs, determine the budget, and establish the time-frame.

In other words, a BANT-qualified prospect has very often already been won by another vendor, and you’ll have to work extremely hard to dislodge that competitor from their incumbent position.

But after answering the question at-hand, I couldn’t help thinking about just how long it takes for some of these shopworn concepts and practices to finally fall out of favor and stop being used.

I mean, we’re certainly not the first to point-out the problems with BANT qualification. The flaws, limitations, and huge strategic ramifications have all been discussed before…by many others…for many years. Yet, some B2B sales teams are still using BANT qualification!

For me, this actually reinforces other lessons I’ve learned while playing “change agent” earlier in my career:

  • The status quo is a hundred times more powerful than you think it is.
  • Companies resist change even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
  • Anything you turn into a process is much more likely to stick around.

When it comes to sales performance improvement, identifying the “better ways” is not the hard part. The hard part is getting the organization to actually change the status quo and adopt those better ways.

And if you need overwhelming evidence of that simple truth, just remember that some companies are still using BANT 🙂

Get Immediate Access To Everything In The SellingBrew Playbook

Related Resources

  • The Anatomy of a Successful B2B Sales Analyst

    What key competencies are most important for a sales analyst to have? This guide covers SellingBrew's research into the 21 most important attributes, skills, and capabilities for sales analysts to develop or possess.

    View This Research
  • Maximizing the Effectiveness of Sales Training

    Research shows that most sales training programs just don't "stick" over the long term. In this on-demand training session, we explore proven strategies and critical steps for developing effective sales training programs that have "stickiness" built-in from the very beginning.

    View This Webinar
  • How to Retain Your Key Customers

    When you lose business from existing accounts, the sales team must acquire even more new business to compensate. In this on-demand training session, learn about seven innovative strategies leading sales operations are using to minimize revenue attrition and customer defection.

    View This Webinar
  • How to Improve Your Close Rates

    Trial and error with something as important as your close rates is risky. How do you know which strategies and tactics you should use to improve? In this on-demand training webinar, learn effective strategies and tactics for improving your sales team's ability to win---at scale and with less risk.

    View This Webinar