SellingBrew

Insights & Tips

Already a subscriber? Login

Become a subscriber and unlock an information arsenal focused on making your sales operation more effective.

Bad Segmentation = Bad Sales Analysis

We’ve fielded countless subscriber questions about generating more credible and defensible findings from sales analysis. Specifically, many of the questions are talking about what we commonly refer to as “false signals.”

Here’s an example…

As part of their effort to optimize their sales pipeline, one Sales Ops team analyzed close-rates by sales rep. By comparing the closing ratios of individual salespeople and digging into the top performers, they were hoping to discover some more effective approaches that could be propagated across the rest of the sales team.

So far, so good. Better than good, in fact…this is great! This is exactly the type of diagnostic approach we advocate for figuring out what’s really working and doing more of it.

But here’s the rub…

When the team took their findings to management, they got shot down. Sales management was quick to dismiss the close-rate performance differences as being “mix related.” In other words, management claimed that the mix of opportunities that each sales rep was dealing with was so varied that radically different close-rates were to be expected.

And in this case, sales management was absolutely correct. The analysts had generated a false signal because they had neglected to properly segment the opportunities in their analysis. In effect, they were comparing apples to oranges. And as a result, their findings were easily discredited and dismissed.

As effective sales analysis is largely a comparative process, proper segmentation is crucial to ensure that you’re always comparing apples to apples and oranges to oranges.

When making these types of comparisons, you always need to be asking, “Can we reasonably expect performance to be similar under these circumstances?” If the answer is no, then you need to apply additional segmentation attributes or data-filters to get to an apples-to-apples comparative basis.

Of course, you’ll still need to defend your findings at the end of the day. That dynamic won’t change. But with proper segmentation underlying your analysis, your findings will be much more accurate, far more credible, and a lot more difficult to dismiss.

Get Immediate Access To Everything In The SellingBrew Playbook

Related Resources

  • Developing Prescriptive Account Plans

    Learn a powerful 7-step process for growing sales from your existing customers. See how to identify exactly where growth opportunities are and create the account plans that will capture them.

    View This Tutorial
  • How to Deal With Churn

    How can we mitigate churn and retain more of the customers, revenues, and profits we've acquired? In this webinar, learn a simple methodology for figuring out what's best in your situation.

    View This Webinar
  • Exploring the Principles of Sales Process Excellence

    There's a big difference between just "trying to improve" in a general sense and using a fact-based method for driving systemic improvement. In this expert interview, Michael Webb discusses applying the time-tested principles of process improvement to B2B sales.

    View This Interview
  • Inside the New Science of Sales

    Leading teams are using data-science to great effect. But all the esoteric talk and technical jargon can be very confusing. In this session, we boil down the core concepts and processes that matter most.

    View This Webinar