SellingBrew

Insights & Tips

Already a subscriber? Login

Become a subscriber and unlock an information arsenal focused on making your sales operation more effective.

Beware of False Signals in Sales Analysis

We’ve fielded countless subscriber questions about generating more credible and defensible findings from sales analysis. Specifically, many of the questions are talking about what we commonly refer to as “false signals.”

Here’s an example…

As part of their effort to optimize their sales pipeline, one Sales Ops team analyzed close-rates by sales rep. By comparing the closing ratios of individual salespeople and digging into the top performers, they were hoping to discover some more effective approaches that could be propagated across the rest of the sales team.

So far, so good. Better than good, in fact…this is great! This is exactly the type of diagnostic approach we advocate for figuring out what’s really working and doing more of it.

But here’s the rub…

When the team took their findings to management, they got shot down. Sales management was quick to dismiss the close-rate performance differences as being “mix related.” In other words, management claimed that the mix of opportunities that each sales rep was dealing with was so varied that radically different close-rates were to be expected.

And in this case, sales management was absolutely correct. The analysts had generated a false signal because they had neglected to properly segment the opportunities in their analysis. In effect, they were comparing apples to oranges. And as a result, their findings were easily discredited and dismissed.

As effective sales analysis is largely a comparative process, proper segmentation is crucial to ensure that you’re always comparing apples to apples and oranges to oranges.

When making these types of comparisons, you always need to be asking, “Can we reasonably expect performance to be similar under these circumstances?” If the answer is no, then you need to apply additional segmentation attributes or data-filters to get to an apples-to-apples comparative basis.

Of course, you’ll still need to defend your findings at the end of the day. That dynamic won’t change. But with proper segmentation underlying your analysis, your findings will be much more accurate, far more credible, and a lot more difficult to dismiss.

Get Immediate Access To Everything In The SellingBrew Playbook

Related Resources

  • Suffering from a Bad Case of Sticker Shock

    In B2B environments where discounting is habitual, it's easy to think that your list prices don't really matter all that much. But before you conclude that list prices are inconsequential in your business, consider this case of a B2B reseller who just couldn't see what they were missing.

    View This Case Study
  • Measuring the Financial Impact of Sales Ops

    How do you measure a Sales Ops function? How do you calculate what you're really getting from your investments? In this on-demand webinar, learn what other Sales Ops groups are doing to measure and communicate their contributions in dollars and cents.

    View This Webinar
  • How to Improve Your Sales Pipeline Analysis

    Pipeline analytics is great for reporting on current performance, but it can do so much more. This guide outlines 12 strategies for improving deal probability, velocity and value across every salesperson in your sales operation.

    View This Guide
  • Innovating to Maximize Sales Productivity

    Without adding headcount, how do you pursue a host of new customers while retaining and growing a massive base of existing customers? Learn how one B2B sales organization increased their capacity, productivity and effectiveness…all at the same time.

    View This Case Study